A new donating feature for the Instacart App helping donors deliver food donations to food insecure individuals.
THEME
Food Insecurity and
Access
DURATION
Oct. 2018 - Dec. 2018
8 weeks
ROLE
UX Designer
UX Researcher
Visual Designer
TEAM
Aswati Panicker
Christine Lu
Naomi Lacy
Through Instacart, a mobile application that provides grocery delivery service, customers could select groceries online and the order is delivered by a personal shopper. On the basis of Instacart, we add a donating section called InstaDonate which help customers deliver their food donations to grocery stores who support food banks/pantries. In this way, donations from individual donors will be collected at grocery stores firstly and then be distributed to local food banks. Leveraging on grocery stories' information of food banks' need and the transportation to food banks through existing supporting programs, donors are able to donate without even leaving home and match their donations with food banks' need.
Click here to view final mock-ups.
Food insecurity is a problem that includes many stakeholders, so each member in our team needed to study different stakeholders individually. I conducted contextual inquiries and interviews with shelter staffs and donors at the church. After that, I collaborated with my teammates to synthesize datas, frame the insights, design principles and design goals together.
After clarifying the design goals, our team conducted brainstorm, wireframing, prototyping ,testing, iteration and presenting in two weeks by the end of the course, and we received positive feedbacks from the clients of this design challenge (IxDA Indy and Level Up Development). However, our design was still very unpolished at that time because of the time limitation.
Therefore, after this course, I stepped back to our framed design principles and design goals and continued to work on this project. I came up with the idea of partnering with Instacart, conducted business analysis, service design, wireframing, testing and iteration in 7 days individually.
Food Insecurity is a wicked problem involves diverse stakeholders, so we started with visualizing the relationship between different stakeholders and categorizing them.
Because of some concerns about vulnerable population, we are not allowed to interact with food insecure individuals, so we decided to study on organizations which provide help to food insecure people either directly or indirectly. We conducted contextual inquiry with the grocery stores, a church, a food bank and a shelter and interviewed (potential) individual donors, dietitians and volunteers. Through primary research, we tried to learn their food management and donating process in detail, the motivation, impacts of these activities and the obstacles they have doing these works.
We synthesized the findings and data points through affinity mapping after conducting primary research. We realized the problem space of food insecurity is so broad that we have to narrow it down. From the affinity diagram, we found that a lot of resources in the system had the potential to provide greater value. Therefore, we chose to focus on making better use of existing resources within the system rather than providing extra resources from outside.
Following this principle, we synthesized the datas again and created a framework stressing on the existing food resources and how they are used ineffectively. We realized that the food management of organizations are much decided by the supporting programs they participated in, so it's easier for us to refine the management of individual donors' resources.
After narrowing down the problem space to making better use of individual donors' food resources, we generated Job To Be Done (JTBD) frameworks to develop insights and clarify the needs of related stakeholders.
DONATION RESOURCES
Collect excess foods from individual donors as food donations.
DONATING PROCESS
Make the donating process time saving and effort saving for individual donors.
DONATION MATCHING
Match the donations from individual donors with the needs of organizations.
After clarifying our design goals, we studied on current ways that tried to achieve similar goals as ours.
Kroger holds a donating activity letting customers purchase the prepared food bags to donate to food banks. Customers could donate and check their grocery orders at the same time.
North Center Church has an information board posting tags of needed foods. The church family will take the tags, buy the foods on the tags and fetch the foods to the church each weekends.
From our design goals and what we learned from the inspirations, we set three generative principles guiding our ideation:
Based on these three generative principles, I focused on individual donors who are not able to or not willing to go out and extracted six typical scenarios in their daily routine near their home. I generated ideas combining donation collection with these scenarios to see how well the process could fit in these scenarios.
After deciding to embed donating activities to grocery delivery service, I chose to leverage on an existing grocery delivery service instead of building a brand new product so that users could start using our service intuitively without switching platforms. To select the platform that matches the profile of our target users, I did competitive analysis on the potential clients.
Among the top grocery delivery services including Instacart, Google Express, AmazonFresh, Shipt and Peapod, Instacart provides the fastest delivery, and it also delivers perishable foods and has wide service area, but its cost is the highest. Our target users are people who hate leaving their houses, so they would prefer the most inclusive and convenient service rather than the cheapest one.
Companies increasingly value social good and brand image. All above grocery delivery companies have partnered with charities to feed people. Instacart are also playing their part supporting people and giving back to the communities.
Instacart partnered with ALDI to donate meals to Feeding America to help neighbors in need on #GivingTuesday.
Shipt offered to donate one can of food to Feeding America for every can that was purchased through their app for grocery delivery during their #Get1Give1 campaign.
Different from existing donating campaigns in which the companies only use their own resources (money and the employee's time and labor), our service will involve customers in the campaign together. In this way, not only Instacart will be much stronger to fight with food insecurity but also there is a greater chance for their efforts to be known by the society.
I tested the low-fi prototypes with 5 Instacart users. The users felt it very convenient to have the shoppers to pick up the donations or select food bags to donate money directly, but there were three details needed to be improved:
InstaDonate is a donating section of the grocery delivery App Instacart. It provides convenient donating experience by (1) picking up food donations from donors' homes and (2) enabling donors to donate money online. These features make the donating activities more accessible, especially for people who are not able or willing to go to certain sites to donate.
Due to the time constraints, our design only focuses on the users' experience of this service. If we have more time to also focus on other stakeholders' sides, we will refine on these two aspects:
I always thought about design as a linear process in which research and design happen separately. But by doing this project, I realize it's a loop process in which research, problem framing and ideation are always mixed. We can't decide when ideas appear or when we need to learn more to move forward. When facing a wicked problem like food insecurity, we need to have multiple rounds of problem framing, and we could come up with ideas based on each round which shape what we need to learn for the next step.
There is no single design solution which could solve every problem in a broad and wicked problem space. We generated 114 data points for the affinity diagram in this project, it's really impossible to cover all of them, but some interrelated problems can be alleviated with the same solution. Even though our design could only respond to a limited amount of problems directly, it could have impact on the whole system of this problem. I feel the latter part of design is basically fit the design concept with the current system which is really challenging.
Through this project, I realized designing for social good is not contradictory with creating business value. They actually support each other. A stable business model will ensure continuous contribution to the society. A positive brand image also makes the business more sustainable.
Heartfelt thanks to IxDA Indianapolis, Level Up Development and Professor Jeffrey Bardzell for organizing this design challenge and providing guidance and feedbacks throughout the project. Many Thanks to Kroger, Bloomington North Center Church, Shalom Community Center, Food bank and the dietitians, Dr. Steven Lalevich, Dr. Angela Babb and Dr. Bobbie H. Saccone for participating in our research. Last but not least, I appreciate the HCI/d Cohort 2020 and my teammates, Aswati Panicker, Christine Lu and Naomi Lacy for their efforts and company throughout this project. I learned so much from them.